Wave Optics: Young's Double Slit Experiment

Why fringes form

Light from two narrow, closely-spaced slits (separation dd) spreads out and overlaps on a screen a distance DD away. At a point on the screen a height yy from the centre, the two waves have traveled slightly different distances, a path difference that, when D≫dD \gg d and the point is close to the centre (y≪Dy \ll D, so the angle is small and sin⁡θ≈tan⁡θ=yD\sin\theta \approx \tan\theta = \dfrac{y}{D}), works out to:

Δ=ydD\Delta = \dfrac{yd}{D}

Bright and dark fringes

Where the path difference is a whole number of wavelengths, the two waves arrive in phase and reinforce: a bright fringe. Where it's a half-integer number of wavelengths, they arrive out of phase and cancel: a dark fringe:

Bright: Δ=nλ,Dark: Δ=(n+12)λ(n=0,±1,±2,…)\text{Bright: } \Delta = n\lambda, \qquad \text{Dark: } \Delta = \left(n+\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\lambda \qquad (n = 0, \pm1, \pm2, \ldots)

Fringe width

Setting Δ=nλ\Delta = n\lambda and solving for yy gives the position of the nnth bright fringe, yn=nλDdy_n = \tfrac{n\lambda D}{d}. Consecutive bright fringes are therefore evenly spaced, a distance apart called the fringe width:

β=λDd\beta = \dfrac{\lambda D}{d}

Dark fringes sit exactly halfway between bright ones, at y=(n+12)βy = \left(n + \tfrac{1}{2}\right)\beta, and are spaced by the same β\beta. The angular fringe width βD=λd\dfrac{\beta}{D} = \dfrac{\lambda}{d} doesn't depend on where the screen is.

Intensity on the screen

If each slit alone gives intensity I0I_0, two waves with phase difference ϕ\phi combine to:

I=4I0cos⁡2ϕ2,ϕ=2πλΔI = 4I_0\cos^2\dfrac{\phi}{2}, \qquad \phi = \dfrac{2\pi}{\lambda}\Delta

Bright fringes reach 4I04I_0, not 2I02I_0, and dark fringes drop to zero. The energy isn't created: it's moved from the dark regions into the bright ones, and the average over the pattern is still 2I02I_0.

Worked example

Two slits are 0.5 mm apart, the screen is 1 m away, and the light has a wavelength of 500 nm. Find the fringe width and the position of the 3rd bright fringe.

Solution: Convert to metres first: d=0.5×10−3 md = 0.5\times10^{-3}\text{ m}, λ=500×10−9 m\lambda = 500\times10^{-9}\text{ m}, D=1 mD=1\text{ m}:

β=λDd=(500×10−9)(1)0.5×10−3=1×10−3 m=1 mm\beta = \dfrac{\lambda D}{d} = \dfrac{(500\times10^{-9})(1)}{0.5\times10^{-3}} = 1\times10^{-3}\text{ m} = 1\text{ mm}

The nnth bright fringe sits at nn fringe-widths from the centre, so the 3rd bright fringe is at:

y3=3β=3 mmy_3 = 3\beta = 3\text{ mm}

The 2nd dark fringe (counting the first dark fringe as n=0n = 0) is at 1.5β=1.51.5\beta = 1.5 mm.

Worked example: the same setup under water

The whole apparatus above is immersed in water (refractive index μ=43\mu = \tfrac{4}{3}). Find the new fringe width.

Solution: Inside the water the wavelength shrinks to λμ\dfrac{\lambda}{\mu}, and β\beta is proportional to λ\lambda:

β′=βμ=1 mm4/3=0.75 mm\beta' = \dfrac{\beta}{\mu} = \dfrac{1\text{ mm}}{4/3} = 0.75\text{ mm}

Worked example: intensity at a quarter-wave path difference

At a point where the path difference is λ4\dfrac{\lambda}{4}, what fraction of the maximum intensity is seen?

Solution: ϕ=2πλ⋅λ4=π2\phi = \dfrac{2\pi}{\lambda} \cdot \dfrac{\lambda}{4} = \dfrac{\pi}{2}, so

I=4I0cos⁡2π4=4I0×12=2I0I = 4I_0\cos^2\dfrac{\pi}{4} = 4I_0 \times \dfrac{1}{2} = 2I_0

That's half the maximum of 4I04I_0.

How the pattern responds to changes

Effect on fringe width
ChangeEffect on β=λDd\beta = \dfrac{\lambda D}{d}
Longer wavelength (red instead of blue)Wider fringes
Screen moved further away (larger DD)Wider fringes
Slits moved closer together (smaller dd)Wider fringes
Apparatus in a medium of index μ\muβ\beta divided by μ\mu
Thin sheet (index μ\mu, thickness tt) over one slitSame width, whole pattern shifts by (μ−1)tDd\dfrac{(\mu - 1)tD}{d} towards that slit

Common mistakes

  • Mixing millimetres, nanometres and metres. Convert everything to metres before substituting, as in the worked example.
  • Miscounting dark fringes. The first dark fringe is at 0.5β0.5\beta (n=0n = 0 in the dark formula), not at β\beta.
  • Expecting 2I02I_0 at a bright fringe. Amplitudes add, so intensity at a bright fringe is 4I04I_0.
  • Thinking a sheet over one slit changes the fringe width. It only shifts the pattern. The spacing depends on λ\lambda, DD and dd alone.

Where this comes up in exams

Young's double-slit experiment and the expression for fringe width are listed in the wave optics units of the JEE Main 2026 and NEET (UG) 2026 syllabi. The JEE Advanced 2026 syllabus limits interference to Young's double slit experiment.

Checked against JEE (Main) 2026 syllabus (NTA), NEET (UG) 2026 syllabus (NMC, published by NTA) and JEE (Advanced) 2026 syllabus. Syllabi can change from year to year, so confirm with the latest official notification for your exam.

Continue learning

A single slit, rather than two, produces a strikingly different pattern: its dark fringes use the same-looking formula as these bright ones, for the opposite reason.