de Broglie Wavelength and Matter Waves
Every moving particle has a wavelength
If light (normally a wave) can behave like a stream of particles (photons), de Broglie proposed the reverse should hold too: every moving particle has an associated wavelength, set by its momentum :
For everyday objects this wavelength is absurdly small and unobservable. It only becomes significant for particles with very small mass, like electrons, whose wavelength at laboratory energies is comparable to the spacing of atoms. Electron microscopes rely on this: an electron beam's wavelength is far shorter than visible light's, so it resolves much finer detail.
The same formula in other forms
Questions rarely hand you the momentum directly. Rewrite in terms of what you're given, using for kinetic energy and for a charge accelerated from rest through a potential difference :
| Given | Wavelength |
|---|---|
| Momentum | |
| Mass and speed | |
| Kinetic energy | |
| Charge accelerated through | |
| Electron accelerated through | nm |
Worked example
Find the de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 100 V.
Solution: The accelerating field does work on the electron, which becomes its kinetic energy:
Substituting into the de Broglie relation:
Plugging in J·s, kg, and C gives a clean, commonly-used shortcut for electrons specifically:
For V:
That's comparable to the spacing between atoms in a crystal, which is exactly why fast electrons diffract off crystal lattices the same way X-rays do.
Worked example: why a cricket ball doesn't diffract
Find the de Broglie wavelength of a 0.15 kg cricket ball moving at 30 m/s.
Solution:
That's around times smaller than a proton. No gap or obstacle is anywhere near that size, so the ball shows no wave behaviour at all.
Worked example: comparing two particles
A proton and an alpha particle are accelerated from rest through the same potential difference. Find the ratio of their de Broglie wavelengths.
Solution: From with the same , . An alpha particle has about 4 times the proton's mass and twice its charge:
If instead the two particles had the same kinetic energy, the charge would drop out and the ratio would be .
When the simple formula stops working
is the non-relativistic kinetic energy, so every formula above assumes the particle is much slower than light. For an electron that holds well at ordinary voltages: the error in is about 0.005% at 100 V and about 0.5% at 10 kV, but it grows to about 5% at 100 kV.
At high voltages, use the relativistic momentum instead, where is the particle's rest energy (511 keV for an electron):
Common mistakes
- Using an energy in eV without converting. In with SI values, must be in joules: multiply eV by .
- Forgetting the charge. An alpha particle carries , so it gains of energy through a potential difference , not .
- Writing . The wavelength goes as . Four times the voltage halves the wavelength.
- Using the electron shortcut for other particles. nm has the electron's mass built in. For anything else, use the full formula.
Where this comes up in exams
Matter waves and the de Broglie relation are listed in the Dual Nature of Matter and Radiation units of the JEE Main 2026 and NEET (UG) 2026 syllabi, and the JEE Advanced 2026 syllabus lists the de Broglie wavelength of matter waves.
Checked against JEE (Main) 2026 syllabus (NTA), NEET (UG) 2026 syllabus (NMC, published by NTA) and JEE (Advanced) 2026 syllabus. Syllabi can change from year to year, so confirm with the latest official notification for your exam.
- Fit it into your week with the free timetable generator.
- Mark it off as you revise in the syllabus tracker.
- See how long you have left: JEE Main 2027 (Session 1) countdown, JEE Advanced 2027 countdown and NEET UG 2027 countdown.